Re: webapps, why so hard

On Jan 17, 5:16 pm, vanekl <va...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 17, 10:51 am, Slobodan Blazeski <slobodan.blaze...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
...

But I would definately for banning the spammers like those MI5 idiot
and the toad.

Slobodan

and the Jew-Haters and the religious fanatics, and the next group of
toxic wash that wanders by.

But your argument that trolls are good for the ecosystem is
interesting. I agree, impotent, harmless trolls could be tolerated.

Few things for a potential forum software:
1. Include a search for previous posts whe there's new thread, like in
ubuntu forums. Many times I tried to ask something but when I wrote
the title of the thread system just showed me old releveant answers ,
that will cut a lot of noise.
2. Rating system, there's a good people, bad people and good people
with bad day.
I think that everybody should be allowed to join the forum as that's
the core of open societies, with prevention from automatic
subscription, but they should get something like few personal fouls
credit. When you lose them all you're gone. With time of good
behaviour they should be refilled.

2. Spam button
Whenever users encounter a post they consider a spam they will just
press spam button, and it'll show in the post that it's marked as
such, if there are more than 3 votes and 2/3 think it's spom post
will be deleted and poster will lose credit.

3. Killfile user
All threads started certain user and all his replies and replies to
his replies will be invisible to those who exercised that option.

Of course this is just an idea finding good numbers for credits and
pardon time is left as an exercise to the reader.

cheers
Slobodan
.