Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- From: George Neuner <gneuner2/@/comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:02:43 -0500
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:01:13 +0000, David Golden
<david.golden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
George Neuner wrote:
my Scottish terrier Scots Gaelic (not to be confused
with the Irish Gaelic or Welsh Gaelic other terriers speak),
Mind your Ps and Qs. ;-)
Welsh is not Gaelic, it's Brythonic. (P-Celtic)
Irish/Scottish/Manx are the Gaelic ones. (Q-Celtic)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goidelic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brythonic_languages
Whoops! I apologize to all the Welsh here.
George
--
for email reply remove "/" from address
.
- References:
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- From: Maciej Katafiasz
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- From: Maciej Katafiasz
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- From: Tim X
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- From: George Neuner
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- From: David Golden
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp indenting tool
- Next by Date: Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- Previous by thread: Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- Next by thread: Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|