Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- From: Xah Lee <xah@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Gene <gene.ress...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
«...all specialized realizations of _functions_ with varying
performance characteristics. Languages offer different combinations
and variations depending on their goals.»
Dear Gene moron,
are you just repeating what i wrote?
i no unstand, why there are so many idiots on newsgroup. Many are
students, many are plainly stupid. But my god, there are just too
many. Many are due to social ignorance. Many are due to testicular
ballisticality.
What is the cause of your idiocy?
Xah
xah@xxxxxxxxxx
∑ http://xahlee.org/
☄
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- From: George Neuner
- Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- References:
- adjustable array vs hash-table
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- From: Xah Lee
- Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- From: Gene
- adjustable array vs hash-table
- Prev by Date: Re: Spartns (fast and flexible tensor representation for Common Lisp)
- Next by Date: Arc already more popular than Python...
- Previous by thread: Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- Next by thread: Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|