Re: Security
- From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <jpn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:51:39 +0100 (CET)
On 2008-01-31, Maciej Katafiasz <mathrick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Den Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:23:33 +0100 skrev Jeronimo Pellegrini:
- Although with (safety 1) you can't really crash the application,
Sure you can: just put some bugs in your code. Forget to convert an
input string into a number somewhere, before doing some maths on it?
Easy, peasy.
Hm, yeash, sounds like fun.
So, not using (safety 0), plus being careful when using (coerce) and
other functions that would bypass type safety.
Coerce doesn't bypass type safety, quite the opposite.
Ops, sorry. Right, coerce will give a value of exactly the type you
need...
J.
.
- References:
- Security
- From: Steve-o
- Re: Security
- From: Jeronimo Pellegrini
- Re: Security
- From: Andrew Reilly
- Re: Security
- From: Jeronimo Pellegrini
- Re: Security
- From: Maciej Katafiasz
- Security
- Prev by Date: Re: Spartns (fast and flexible tensor representation for Common Lisp)
- Next by Date: Re: Paul Graham's Arc is released today... what is the long term impact?
- Previous by thread: Re: Security
- Next by thread: Re: Security
- Index(es):