Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- From: John <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 31 Jan 2008 20:35:35 GMT
George Neuner wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:29:15 -0800 (PST), Xah Lee <xah@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Gene <gene.ress...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
�...all specialized realizations of _functions_ with varying
performance characteristics. Languages offer different combinations
and variations depending on their goals.�
Dear Gene moron,
are you just repeating what i wrote?
i no unstand, why there are so many idiots on newsgroup. Many are
students, many are plainly stupid. But my god, there are just too
many. Many are due to social ignorance. Many are due to testicular
ballisticality.
What is the cause of your idiocy?
Xah
xah@xxxxxxxxxx
? http://xahlee.org/
?
The only truly ignorant person here is you.
George
--
As a man much more eloquent than this Xah Lee idiot^Wgentleman
once said, "It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury;
signifying nothing"
John
--
.
- References:
- Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- From: George Neuner
- Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- Prev by Date: Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- Next by Date: Re: Tail recursion syntactic sugar faked with TAGBODY-based construct?
- Previous by thread: Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- Next by thread: Re: adjustable array vs hash-table
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|