Re: determining the type of a variable in CL
- From: "Alex Mizrahi" <udodenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:42:14 +0200
s> unfamiliar codebase. This method takes a handful of parameters that I
s> now have to trace back to the original calling method in order to find
s> out what they actually are. Or do I?
s> In statically-typed languages its easy to find out more about the
s> types in use in a specific context (function or method) because of the
s> declarations.
and in dynamic-typed languages it is easy to find out more about the types
in use in specific context .. in runtime.
there are plenty of ways to do inspection, as other people pointed out.
but i wonder what stopped you from inserting PRINTs in the function of
interest and see what parameters are. isn't that obvious?
.
- References:
- determining the type of a variable in CL
- From: sinistral
- determining the type of a variable in CL
- Prev by Date: Re: determining the type of a variable in CL
- Next by Date: Re: I like arc
- Previous by thread: Re: determining the type of a variable in CL
- Next by thread: Re: determining the type of a variable in CL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading