Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb+google@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:46:06 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 6, 3:44 pm, d...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Off the top of my head, but with a generational GC that stops all
threads while it runs, you could have "pseudo read-only" pages in the
nursery and then arrange that when the objects in them are promoted to a
higher generation they go into pages destined to be hardware-enforced
read-only. The GC then applies hardware protections as its last action
before resuming mutation.
This kind of thing is exactly what I meant by not requiring either
special HW support or heroic implementation strategies!
.
- References:
- Why it gives me always different results
- From: AngelP
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Russell McManus
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: Duane Rettig
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- From: dan
- Why it gives me always different results
- Prev by Date: Re: Why it gives me always different results
- Next by Date: Re: Erlang concurrency
- Previous by thread: Re: Why it gives me always different results
- Next by thread: Re: Why it gives me always different results
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|