Re: notation



På Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:57:21 +0100, skrev Alex Mizrahi <udodenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

l> ;; CL is not flexible enough to be able to implement easily such
l> syntax extensions
l> (find element list :key (a œ b œ c))

if you really prefer (a œ b œ c) to (œ a b c), and even (œ a œ b œ c) won't
satisfy you, than perhaps it would be better for you to use some other
programming language.. Fortress?



Unicode is not a rare thing in CL...

--------------
John Thingstad
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: notation
    ... satisfy you, than perhaps it would be better for you to use some other ... programming language.. ... Fortress? ... Unicode is not a rare thing in CL... ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: notation
    ... satisfy you, than perhaps it would be better for you to use some other ... programming language.. ... Fortress? ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: notation
    ... satisfy you, than perhaps it would be better for you to use some other ... programming language.. ... Fortress? ... Unicode is not a rare thing in CL... ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: beginning with ML
    ... development of the Fortress programming language. ... influenced by functional programming languages - with Guy Steele at ... the helm, you would expect it to be. ...
    (comp.lang.functional)
  • Re: OT: first source release of Fortress
    ... FWIW, here's the note I sent to our group: ... Sun just announced their preliminary release of the Fortress ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)