Re: notation
- From: "John Thingstad" <jpthing@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:12:20 +0100
På Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:50:53 +0100, skrev Raymond Wiker <raw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
"John Thingstad" <jpthing@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
På Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:57:21 +0100, skrev Alex Mizrahi
<udodenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
l> ;; CL is not flexible enough to be able to implement easily such
l> syntax extensions
l> (find element list :key (a œ b œ c))
if you really prefer (a œ b œ c) to (œ a b c), and even (œ a œ b œ
c) won't
satisfy you, than perhaps it would be better for you to use some other
programming language.. Fortress?
Unicode is not a rare thing in CL...
Unicode *does not exist* in CL, but it may be available in
certain CL implementations...
.... implementations.
In fact it is available in nearly all.
(Read the code and comments)
--------------
John Thingstad
.
- References:
- λ notation
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: λ notation
- From: levy
- Re: notation
- From: Alex Mizrahi
- Re: notation
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: notation
- From: Raymond Wiker
- λ notation
- Prev by Date: Re: notation
- Next by Date: Re: need help for a simple macro
- Previous by thread: Re: notation
- Next by thread: Re: notation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
