Re: System compilation failure, CLPPCRE, ASDF, SBCL involved
- From: Juho Snellman <jsnell@xxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Feb 2008 22:27:16 +0200
tim <TimJ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:45:24 -0800, Thomas A. Russ wrote:
I have noticed that SBCL sometimes returns t in failure-p, even when there
are only warnings and no Error messages, and an output file has been
generated OK. This might explain it.
That is how COMPILE-FILE is specified to work by the standard:
failure-p should be true if there were any errors or warnings (besides
style-warnings) during the compilation.
--
Juho Snellman
.
- References:
- System compilation failure, CLPPCRE, ASDF, SBCL involved
- From: Holger Schauer
- Re: System compilation failure, CLPPCRE, ASDF, SBCL involved
- From: Juho Snellman
- Re: System compilation failure, CLPPCRE, ASDF, SBCL involved
- From: Holger Schauer
- Re: System compilation failure, CLPPCRE, ASDF, SBCL involved
- From: Thomas A. Russ
- Re: System compilation failure, CLPPCRE, ASDF, SBCL involved
- From: tim
- System compilation failure, CLPPCRE, ASDF, SBCL involved
- Prev by Date: Re: Push/Pop for list tail
- Next by Date: Re: what would this look like in common lisp
- Previous by thread: Re: System compilation failure, CLPPCRE, ASDF, SBCL involved
- Next by thread: Re: System compilation failure, CLPPCRE, ASDF, SBCL involved
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|