Re: Why Lisp?
- From: Ken Tilton <kennytilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:57:26 -0500
Scott wrote:
On Feb 28, 10:58 am, Ken Tilton <kennytil...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"No, Perl. ________________"
"We lost the documentation on quantum mechanics. You'll have to
decode the regexes yourself." Who knew the img tag had a title
attribute.
You're getting too used to defending Lisp - the comic is an attack on
Perl.
Scot, you ignorant ***. The subject is comedy, not language wars. Do try to keep up.
Come to think of it, does Perl /ever/ get into flamewars? Java, Scheme, Python, OCaml -- sure, but Perl? Is that because it never tried to crawl out of the primordial ooze of scripting to walk upright on dry land? Seems to me that was Python's mistake.
kenny
--
http://smuglispweeny.blogspot.com/
http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/
"In the morning, hear the Way;
in the evening, die content!"
-- Confucius
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Lisp?
- From: Scott
- Re: Why Lisp?
- From: Joost Diepenmaat
- Re: Why Lisp?
- References:
- Why Lisp?
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Why Lisp?
- From: Michael Bohn
- Re: Why Lisp?
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Why Lisp?
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: Why Lisp?
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Why Lisp?
- From: Scott
- Why Lisp?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Lisp?
- Next by Date: Re: Why Lisp?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Lisp?
- Next by thread: Re: Why Lisp?
- Index(es):