Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- From: Holger Schauer <Holger.Schauer@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:42:37 +0100
On 5294 September 1993, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
That said, if all implementations running on Linux could agree on the
mapping between ext2/ext3 file systems and CL pathnames, it already be
a nice step forward.
Similarly for all implementations running on MS-Windows to map NTFS
and CL.
I think that might be a nice CDR proposal, where "that" translates to
"proposal how file systems and CL pathnames should match on the major
platforms". Now, what constitutes a major platform is probably a
matter of debate.
BTW, I think it would be nice if there would be some obvious link from
cliki and the ALU pages/wiki to CDR, although one might argue that
four final CDR documents hardly is a lot of content.
On the other hand, some implementations may want to present an
homogeneous view (for CL code) across various OS and FS, and this
requirement is at cross with the portability one (even if it eases
intra-'implementation' portability).
Well, that would have to be seen, wouldn't it? Of course, pathnames
are file system specific and some parts might not be possible to hide
beneath some homogeneous view, but I fail to see how that differs from
the situation we have today. But perhaps I'm missing something obvious
here ..
Holger
--
--- http://hillview.bugwriter.net/ ---
"Ja, und ganz sicher sind *SIE* hinter uns her und wollen uns Qt und KDE
nehmen, so wie sie es schon mit Bielefeld gemacht haben."
-- Florian Kuehnert in de.comp.os.linux.misc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
- Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- References:
- DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- From: Thibault Langlois
- Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- From: Thomas A. Russ
- Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- From: Thibault Langlois
- Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- From: Kent M Pitman
- Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
- DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- Prev by Date: Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Hunch-o-cells R.I.P.?
- Previous by thread: Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- Next by thread: Re: DIRECTORY behavior with /= implementations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|