Re: Structures
- From: tim <TimJ@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:18:07 -0000
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:20:32 -0400, Ken Tilton wrote:
tim wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:06:23 -0700, Tayssir John Gabbour wrote:Hunh? As you noted, that is merely the default. It is no big deal to
supply the :conc-name option.
kenny
The language has a spec of 1,000 pages and a huge number of productions.
Some structures can be reused across multiple productions but many can't.
So there are many structures and many fields. Also if overriding one needs
to check that the name is not a duplicate, used elsewhere, which is more
work.
(* trivial large)
=> large
With objects it might not be so large a job because generic
functions get built that can be shared (same name) across many different
classes.
I haven't used this because I am concerned about speed of execution,
without much evidence I admit.
Tim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Structures
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Structures
- References:
- Structures
- From: dstein64
- Re: Structures
- From: Tayssir John Gabbour
- Re: Structures
- From: tim
- Re: Structures
- From: Ken Tilton
- Structures
- Prev by Date: wholesale, junior seri ( paypal accept ) ( www. top-saler.com )
- Next by Date: Re: Distributing Lisp applications.
- Previous by thread: Re: Structures
- Next by thread: Re: Structures
- Index(es):