Re: (apply #'and '(t t nil)) not work

From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:52:45 +0000 (UTC)

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:55:44 +0800, fishmacs wrote:

pjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Pascal J. Bourguignon) writes:

Indeed, AND and OR are macros, not functions. This allows to shortcut:

But SBCL said AND is a closure?

SBCL 1.0.5 and the Common Lisp HyperSpec both say AND is a macro.

--
Dave Seaman
Court affirms Judge Yohn's ruling.
<http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=41761>
.

References:
- (apply #'and '(t t nil)) not work
  - From: fishmacs
- Re: (apply #'and '(t t nil)) not work
  - From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
- Re: (apply #'and '(t t nil)) not work
  - From: fishmacs

Prev by Date: Re: Appropriate case for a macro?
Next by Date: Re: indent for CL
Previous by thread: Re: (apply #'and '(t t nil)) not work
Next by thread: Re: (apply #'and '(t t nil)) not work
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Rounding off double precision
... A parameter is a symbolic constant, not a literal constant. ... Dave Seaman ... Court affirms Judge Yohn's ruling. ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: Press any key to continue?
... My keyboard has both a RETURN key and an ENTER key. ... Dave Seaman ... Court affirms Judge Yohn's ruling. ...
(comp.lang.fortran)