Re: Iteration in lisp
- From: Ken Tilton <kennytilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:04:20 -0400
Duane Rettig wrote:
helpful. (I always got a kick out of anal programs, in any language,
that had error messages that say something like "Error: missing comma
after 'this'" [well, why doesn't the program give the programmer a
break and add the comma - if it's unambiguous, what's the harm? that
the wayward programmer will never learn his lesson???] ... sheesh)
Because while inserting a comma produces valid syntax the editing error might not have been omitting a comma. It usually is, but do we want compilers guessing at which mistake me made? Without mentioning it?
People have had little success writing software that works, it may be too soon for people to be writing software that figures out what software other people meant to write.
kenny
-----
ECLM 2008 Resources: http://www.weitz.de/eclm2008/
Rant:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1331906677993764413
The Lisp Way:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9173722505157942928
.
- References:
- Iteration in lisp
- From: rigaha@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- From: Kent M Pitman
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- From: Kent M Pitman
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- From: Robert Maas, http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- From: Kent M Pitman
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- From: Scott Burson
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- From: Duane Rettig
- Iteration in lisp
- Prev by Date: Re: Greenspunning ML (revisited)
- Next by Date: Re: Questions - Higer Order Functions
- Previous by thread: Re: Iteration in lisp
- Next by thread: Re: Iteration in lisp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|