Re: delete command weirdness
- From: Nathaniel Calloway <ntc6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 13:58:57 -0400
You know, it occurred to me that an implementation could copy the car
and cdr of the second cons cell into the car and cdr of the first cons
cell -- that would be cute.
Of course we are still not operating on "testing" itself, we just
happen in this case to create that illusion via mutation.
I hope this confuses things. :)
This is exactly the behavior I was asking about. I initially didn't
understand why delete wouldn't do something like this. I now know that
this sort of behavior isn't the concern of delete
However it became obfuscated in the storm of people calling me a clown
and whatnot.
-Nat
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: delete command weirdness
- From: Matthias Benkard
- Re: delete command weirdness
- References:
- delete command weirdness
- From: Nathaniel Calloway
- Re: delete command weirdness
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: delete command weirdness
- From: Nathaniel Calloway
- Re: delete command weirdness
- From: Paul Donnelly
- Re: delete command weirdness
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: delete command weirdness
- From: Nathaniel Calloway
- Re: delete command weirdness
- From: Peter Hildebrandt
- Re: delete command weirdness
- From: Ken Tilton
- delete command weirdness
- Prev by Date: Re: alists and packages question
- Next by Date: Re: delete command weirdness
- Previous by thread: Re: delete command weirdness
- Next by thread: Re: delete command weirdness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading