Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior

From: Edi Weitz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 21:41:08 +0200

On Thu, 29 May 2008 12:11:53 -0400, Ken Tilton <kennytilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This has been my experience every time in porting from ACL to LW: LW
was compliant, ACL was easier to live with.

Yep, let's get rid of the fucking standard once and for all. Who
needs it anyway?

--

Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny.

Real email: (replace (subseq "spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx" 5) "edi")
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
  - From: Ken Tilton

References:
- Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
  - From: Jim Newton
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
  - From: Edi Weitz
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
  - From: Ken Tilton

Prev by Date: Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
Next by Date: Re: Lisp on Nokia N810?
Previous by thread: Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
Next by thread: Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread