Re: Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- From: Matthew D Swank <akopa.gmane.poster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:16:10 GMT
On Thu, 29 May 2008 20:44:21 +0200, Pascal Costanza wrote:
Matthew D Swank wrote:....
....those who make glib comments about how much clearer an idiomatic,
eager solution is in lisp* are missing the point of trying to learn
from others.
I was referring to your and my Lisp solution. I think my solution is
easier to understand. Your Lisp solution has to express a lot of
machinery to make the lazy evaluation work, and that distracts from the
problem you actually want to solve, IMHO.
I wasn't asking how to transform a list in lisp based on some global
property about the list, I was asking if there was a better way to
express idiomatic haskell.
Fair enough, but that wasn't clear to me from your original post. So
sorry for misunderstanding you.
Well, I should have been more explicit.
Pascal
Matt
.
- References:
- Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- From: Matthew D Swank
- Re: Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- From: Matthew D Swank
- Re: Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- From: Matthew D Swank
- Re: Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- Prev by Date: Re: Loop Alternatives
- Next by Date: Re: blogs, longbets.org, and education of sociology
- Previous by thread: Re: Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- Next by thread: Re: Translating circular Haskell code to lisp
- Index(es):