Re: C++ program as a Lisp expression
- From: Dihydrogen Monoxide <rares.marian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 23:27:03 GMT
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:24:00 +0000, Pixel // pinterface wrote:
People have been trying to give Lisp a more ALGOL-inspired syntax since
the day McCarthy discovered Lisp. It originally started with
M-Expressions[1]; at one point there was Dylan[2]. Many other attempts
were made. But in spite of years of attempts by various people to shirk
the parenthesi, Lispers still use S-expressions.
Maybe--just maybe--you'll manage to pull people from the C++ side closer
to lisp, but if history is any indication you aren't likely to attract
many lispers. They've tried other syntaxes and found them wanting.
I know the ()s are scary at first, but you get used to them, and
eventually take them for granted.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-expression [2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dylan_%28programming_language%29
And yes, this is just a more verbose version of what His Kennyness
already stated.
Oooh me like Dylan. Shouldn't that be Kenniness?
I think Bolero's language, typo, will have () [] {} and ||, but no <>, %
%, ::.
In fact I just might choose to use underscores. hmm _symbol_... yeah I
think that would be great.
--
http://dihymo.blogspot.com
http;//ntltrmllgnc.stumbleupon.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ program as a Lisp expression
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: C++ program as a Lisp expression
- Prev by Date: Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- Next by Date: Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- Previous by thread: Re: blogs, longbets.org, and education of sociology
- Next by thread: Re: C++ program as a Lisp expression
- Index(es):