Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Pascal Costanza <pc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:21:07 +0200
Ken Tilton wrote:
I just checked the CLHS on d-m-c and the entry is longer than the Scheme standard. No thanks.
I'm not surprised.
Pascal
--
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
.
- References:
- Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Jim Newton
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Edi Weitz
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Edi Weitz
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- From: Ken Tilton
- Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- Prev by Date: Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- Next by Date: Re: New book about Common Lisp: Let Over Lambda
- Previous by thread: Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- Next by thread: Re: Allegro and Sbcl disagree on no-primary-method behavior
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|