Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Patrick May <pjm@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 20:00:46 -0400
"John Thingstad" <jpthing@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
På Fri, 30 May 2008 12:13:31 +0200, skrev Jon Harrop
<jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Emacs is very poor quality software, IMHO. It is unstable, crashing
all the time, and incredibly user unfriendly from a user interface
perspective.
???
I have used Emacs for 20 years and have never had it crash on me yet.
That is my experience as well. Emacs is the most stable
application I've ever used. Also, the user interface is fantastic.
If the OP thinks it's unfriendly, maybe Emacs just chooses its friends
carefully.
Regards,
Patrick
------------------------------------------------------------------------
S P Engineering, Inc. | Large scale, mission-critical, distributed OO
| systems design and implementation.
pjm@xxxxxxx | (C++, Java, Common Lisp, Jini, middleware, SOA)
.
- References:
- Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Spiros Bousbouras
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Dihydrogen Monoxide
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Paul Donnelly
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: nathan . baum
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Andrew Reilly
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: John Thingstad
- Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp, 50th Birthday
- Next by Date: Re: Lisp, 50th Birthday
- Previous by thread: Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- Next by thread: Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|