Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Stanisław Halik <sthalik+usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 04:59:36 +0000 (UTC)
thus spoke Paul Donnelly <paul-donnelly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Assuming that when one program goes awry, the whole image goes down, you
have a point. But that wouldn't necessarily happen.
The process will die on OOM (out-of-memory) anyway. That's not something
a Lisp image could control - it's the kernel that kills processes under
memory shortage.
--
The great peril of our existence lies in the fact that our diet consists
entirely of souls. -- Inuit saying
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Paul Donnelly
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- References:
- Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Spiros Bousbouras
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Dihydrogen Monoxide
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Paul Donnelly
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: nathan . baum
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- From: Paul Donnelly
- Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Visual Frameworks vs. Cells compared to Flow-Based Programming
- Next by Date: Re: Cells compared to Flow-Based Programming
- Previous by thread: Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- Next by thread: Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- Index(es):