Re: Let Over Lambda chapter 4
- From: Pascal Costanza <pc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:44:51 +0200
Doug Hoyte wrote:
On Jun 27, 8:31 pm, Rainer Joswig <jos...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Thanks for your comments.
* DEFsomething or DEFINE-SOMETHING
* doING
* DOsomething
Would you use this convention? No, of course you wouldn't.
I already use the with- convention.
Sorry I think there was some confusion. I myself like and use
all the conventions you mentioned above. I was only suggesting
that conventions shouldn't supersede proper naming of functions,
macros, or variables. Because with-open-file is named well, it
is easy to remember it is a macro.
I also understand why people like the earmuffs and have nothing
against their use. I was just trying to explain why I don't
use them.
....but as a book author you have a responsibility that goes beyond what you personally like and don't like...
Pascal
--
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
.
- References:
- Let Over Lambda chapter 4
- From: Doug Hoyte
- Re: Let Over Lambda chapter 4
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Let Over Lambda chapter 4
- From: Doug Hoyte
- Let Over Lambda chapter 4
- Prev by Date: Re: Let Over Lambda chapter 4
- Next by Date: Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Previous by thread: Re: Let Over Lambda chapter 4
- Next by thread: Re: Let Over Lambda chapter 4
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|