Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: "John Thingstad" <jpthing@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:18:50 +0200
På Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:25:13 +0200, skrev Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov+usenet@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:52:41 +0200, "John Thingstad" <jpthing@xxxxxxxxx> said:
|...
|| BTW, what's exactly the difference between paren matching and pattern
|| matching?
|| ...
| pattern matching as in cl-ppcre, cl-yacc, cl-unify,...?
As in
f 0 = 0
f 1 = 1
f (n+2) = f n + f (n+1)
Unless we are talking about parent matching, that is...
---Vassil.
I think my point was that there are many types of pattern matching.
Why should one be a part of the language and the others not?
Seems to me to be pretty few places in the code where algebraic matching helps the code.
--------------
John Thingstad
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Vassil Nikolov
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- References:
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: jon . harrop . ms . sharp
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: jon . harrop . ms . sharp
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Vassil Nikolov
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Prev by Date: Re: access closure variable
- Next by Date: Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Previous by thread: Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Next by thread: Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|