Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov+usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:30:42 -0400
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:18:50 +0200, "John Thingstad" <jpthing@xxxxxxxxx> said:
| På Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:25:13 +0200, skrev Vassil Nikolov
| <vnikolov+usenet@xxxxxxxxx>:
|| On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:52:41 +0200, "John Thingstad"
|| <jpthing@xxxxxxxxx> said:
||
|| |...
|| || BTW, what's exactly the difference between paren matching and pattern
|| || matching?
|| || ...
|| | pattern matching as in cl-ppcre, cl-yacc, cl-unify,...?
||
|| As in
||
|| f 0 = 0
|| f 1 = 1
|| f (n+2) = f n + f (n+1)
||
|| Unless we are talking about parent matching, that is...
| I think my point was that there are many types of pattern matching.
| Why should one be a part of the language and the others not?
| Seems to me to be pretty few places in the code where algebraic
| matching helps the code.
I did not follow up in disagreement with you...
---Vassil.
--
Peius melius est. ---Ricardus Gabriel.
.
- References:
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: jon . harrop . ms . sharp
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: jon . harrop . ms . sharp
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: Vassil Nikolov
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Prev by Date: Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Next by Date: Re: access closure variable
- Previous by thread: Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Next by thread: Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|