Re: Better measure of program length?
- From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:42:28 +0200
Robert Maas, http://tinyurl.com/uh3t wrote:
For example if you want to know the count of number of
some element in a sequence (string or list), you type "cou" and
at that point the editor knows what you mean and can remind you the
sequence of the parameters to the COUNT function and the also
keyword options available.
Unless you have rebound those symbols or redefined lexical definitions.
I don't like software that tries to be smarter than me (it usually fails).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Better measure of program length?
- From: Kenny
- Re: Better measure of program length?
- References:
- Re: Better measure of program length?
- From: Robert Maas, http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Better measure of program length?
- Prev by Date: Re: Better measure of program length?
- Next by Date: Re: traverse a list two elements at a time?
- Previous by thread: Re: Better measure of program length?
- Next by thread: Re: Better measure of program length?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|