Re: The Fundamental Confusion of Xah
- From: Christophe <christophe.allegrini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
On 1 août, 12:13, Jon Harrop <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Duane Rettig wrote:
Jon Harrop <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hence they migrated to Java in order to turn a profit and keep the
business afloat.
Allegro CL has been talking to C and Fortran since its inception in
the late 1980s. Does that mean we've migrated to C or Fortran? Of
course not. It only means that we know the value of having our Common
Lisp based products communicating with other important languages.
Nowadays, languages to communicate with include XML, Prolog, and yes,
even Java, among others.
What proportion of your code base is written in Java?
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancyhttp://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?u
Hello,
Who is the equivalent of JLinker for ocaml ?
Best Regards,
Christophe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Fundamental Confusion of Xah
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: The Fundamental Confusion of Xah
- References:
- Re: The Fundamental Confusion of Xah
- From: Duane Rettig
- Re: The Fundamental Confusion of Xah
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: The Fundamental Confusion of Xah
- Prev by Date: Re: The Fundamental Confusion of Xah
- Next by Date: Re: WishLisp News v 0.0.1.3.4
- Previous by thread: Re: The Fundamental Confusion of Xah
- Next by thread: Re: The Fundamental Confusion of Xah
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|