Re: CLHS hermeneutics: HANDLER-BIND as a top level form...
- From: Pascal Costanza <pc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:32:17 +0200
Kent M Pitman wrote:
Marco Antoniotti <marcoxa@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
[It's a pity that it's not easily possible to set up global conditionDitto.
handlers, without opening up a new dynamic extent.]
There are a number of "obvious" features people want in CL that were not-so-obvious after all when you had an architecture like the LispM,
and that influenced the design of CL in various places.
I certainly didn't mean to say that it would be easy to design such a feature. It's clear that there are some important issues to be solved here...
Pascal
--
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
.
- References:
- CLHS hermeneutics: HANDLER-BIND as a top level form...
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- Re: CLHS hermeneutics: HANDLER-BIND as a top level form...
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: CLHS hermeneutics: HANDLER-BIND as a top level form...
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- Re: CLHS hermeneutics: HANDLER-BIND as a top level form...
- From: Kent M Pitman
- CLHS hermeneutics: HANDLER-BIND as a top level form...
- Prev by Date: [ANN] ECL 0.9l
- Next by Date: Re: "beta" is a reach, but....
- Previous by thread: Re: CLHS hermeneutics: HANDLER-BIND as a top level form...
- Next by thread: Re: CLHS hermeneutics: HANDLER-BIND as a top level form...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|