Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:22:48 +0200
Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
What about basic data types; what about the type system itself?This is covered by the Special Operator THE ;-)
ATOM?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- References:
- An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Vsevolod
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Tamas K Papp
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Tamas K Papp
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Vsevolod
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Matthew D Swank
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Kaz Kylheku
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Matthew D Swank
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: akopa
- An Acceptable Lisp
- Prev by Date: Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- Next by Date: Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- Previous by thread: Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- Next by thread: Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- Index(es):
