Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Vsevolod <vseloved@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 30, 5:50 pm, pls.m...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 25 Ago, 21:27, Vsevolod <vselo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
read all (no, thanks)
You know, we are at high-end here.
High-end discussions are by definition very personal and always
objective.
So, please don't come here (or anywhere else) expecting some major
consensus...
-PM
I don't, and after reading it for quite a while I know what this group
is like.
I was more interested in the discussion and I've got a lot of food for
thought actually.
(Hope, that in the process, nobody's feelings were hurt :)
Best regards,
Vsevolod
.
- References:
- An Acceptable Lisp
- From: Vsevolod
- Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- From: pls . mrjm
- An Acceptable Lisp
- Prev by Date: Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- Next by Date: Re: How much tuning does regular lisp compilers do?
- Previous by thread: Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- Next by thread: Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- Index(es):