Re: Fundamental Problems of Lisp
- From: namekuseijin <namekuseijin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
On 30 ago, 00:28, Don Geddis <d...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"xah...@xxxxxxxxx" <xah...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 29 Aug 2008:
You didn't gratuitously insult your readers (much...)
Yeah, here's him insulting all the verms below his gorgeous IQ:
"First of all, if you don't have a master degree in computer science,
and, if your specialization is not in computer languages design (i.e.
logics, mathematical formalism, some elements of computational
linguistics), then, you probably won't understand this post."
OTOH, his highness himself seems positively confused and unable to
make a distinction between syntax and semantics, despite being pointed
already more than once to simple examples that dispell all of his
verbose logic based on false premises...
.
- References:
- Re: [xah] Fundamental Problems of Lisp
- From: Don Geddis
- Re: [xah] Fundamental Problems of Lisp
- Prev by Date: Re: legitimate closure?
- Next by Date: Re: An Acceptable Lisp
- Previous by thread: Re: [xah] Fundamental Problems of Lisp
- Next by thread: Re: SBCL's (run-program ... :output out) is not working on Windows
- Index(es):