Re: An Acceptable Lisp

From: Mark Tarver <dr.mtarver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:02:49 -0700 (PDT)

QUOTE
What CL has is optional type declaration and runtime check. Qi
implements static type-checking and type-inference, and besides other
functional-paradigm features. But it abandons prefix-notation and
multi-paradigm approach as a whole.
UNQUOTE

Actually Qi is prefix - just like Lisp.

Mark

.

References:
- An Acceptable Lisp
  - From: Vsevolod

Prev by Date: Re: Fundamental Problems of Lisp
Next by Date: Re: How much tuning does regular lisp compilers do?
Previous by thread: Re: An Acceptable Lisp
Next by thread: Re: An Acceptable Lisp
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread