Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- From: Vend <vend82@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
On 11 Set, 11:09, Jon Harrop <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Thingstad wrote:
In fact overflows and heap management are two of the most over-hyped
criticisms in C++ development. I have to go back to 80's to see the last
time this was a serious issue. Similarly the first fit heap management
scheme is long dead. Heap fragmentation is less of a problem.
You obviously haven't been reading the news:
Google's new web browser Chrome is written in C++. A buffer overrun security
vulnerability was found in it 6 days ago:
http://julianrdz.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/google-chrome-buffer-overfl...
Avoiding heap fragmentation in concurrent C++ was a major problem for
Google:
http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_04.html
I'm a bit skeptical about the claim that heap fragmentation can be a
significant problem in a web browser.
My cynical guess is that Google realized that their browser was so
prone to crashes and glitches that they decided to split it in several
processes as a form of "damage control".
Heap fragmentation has been a headache for Mono since its inception:
http://www.mono-project.com/Compacting_GC
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?u
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- From: namekuseijin
- Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- References:
- Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- Prev by Date: Re: Depth First Search traversal of this list
- Next by Date: Re: Depth First Search traversal of this list
- Previous by thread: Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- Next by thread: Re: What do you LISPers think of Haskell?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|