Re: RFC 1037 NFILE implementations around?
- From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb+google@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 29, 6:06 pm, Andreas Davour <ante...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Talking about I/O performance in detail is a big can of worms, since it
means subtle interaction between hardware and software. You say a 3670
was slower than a 3/120 and that might be correct. To what extent that
was because NFS was good/bad is another matter.
Sun 3/120 (sorry). I didn't say a 3670 was slower than a 3/120 for FS
access: I said it was slower accessing a directly-attached disk than a
3/120 was at accessing the same model of disk over a network.
.
- References:
- Re: RFC 1037 NFILE implementations around?
- From: kodifik
- Re: RFC 1037 NFILE implementations around?
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: RFC 1037 NFILE implementations around?
- Prev by Date: Re: compiling a Lisp source to exe
- Next by Date: Re: compiling a Lisp source to exe
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC 1037 NFILE implementations around?
- Next by thread: Re: RFC 1037 NFILE implementations around?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|