Re: Global lexical variables?
- From: Russell Wallace <russell.wallace@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 30, 8:42 pm, Kaz Kylheku <kkylh...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The ``it'' that CLISP is not approving of here is that you are trying
to use an undefined variable. This is not well-defined behavior in Lisp.
But I did define it:
(defvar clauses-table
(make-hash-table
:test 'equal))
Doesn't that count as a definition?
(Thanks for the explanation about the problems with using global
lexical hacks -- my intuition was right about that, at least :-))
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global lexical variables?
- From: Kaz Kylheku
- Re: Global lexical variables?
- From: Thomas A. Russ
- Re: Global lexical variables?
- References:
- Global lexical variables?
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Global lexical variables?
- From: Kaz Kylheku
- Global lexical variables?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cons cell archaic!?
- Next by Date: Re: Is it a bad sign...
- Previous by thread: Re: Global lexical variables?
- Next by thread: Re: Global lexical variables?
- Index(es):