Re: Is it a bad sign...
- From: Kenny <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:04:22 -0400
D Herring wrote:
Kenny wrote:
....when apropos takes a minute to search for matches?
And speaking of minutes, it has been quite a few waiting for loop to count all the symbols. I wonder why it is so slow, doing maybe 1.5m/minute. And what the hell does apropos know that loop does not about zooming through all the symbols?
Did you compile the loop?
Down to 1.4s cpu and real. Bouncing is a drag, but when I do I'll mebbe test from scratch, see if the 80s deal aso goes away.
OK, 6.5m symbols. That's a lot, right?
What does your code do? Intern symbols all day?
Not my code. Image-dumped hash tables are serving as a poor man's db.
And where should I put my money in my next computer?
Take a look at
http://arstechnica.com/guides.ars
In particular the System Guides. I personally think the sweet spot is around 4GB RAM with a dual-core 64-bit CPU (and OS). Unless you're willing to learn linux or OS X, Vista's probably the way to go.
Awesome. Thx for such a precise recommendations. I love not having to think, and this NG is great for that.......that might have come out wrong....
kxo
.
- References:
- Is it a bad sign...
- From: Kenny
- Re: Is it a bad sign...
- From: D Herring
- Is it a bad sign...
- Prev by Date: Re: S-expr form of C
- Next by Date: Re: CLOS and the condition system in the CLHS
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it a bad sign...
- Next by thread: Re: Is it a bad sign...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|