Re: Global lexical variables?
- From: Russell Wallace <russell.wallace@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 30, 10:11 pm, t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Thomas A. Russ) wrote:
Well, that certainly should count.
But where is this definition in relation to the REFUTE function, since
that is where CLISP was complaining in your earlier post.
Turns out it was later than the function definition, rearranging them
fixed it. Thanks!
Oh, and by the way, it would be good for you to adopt the special
variable naming convention. It makes the meaning clearer:
(defvar *clauses-table* ...)
Yeah, maybe you're right.
.
- References:
- Global lexical variables?
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Global lexical variables?
- From: Kaz Kylheku
- Re: Global lexical variables?
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Global lexical variables?
- From: Thomas A. Russ
- Global lexical variables?
- Prev by Date: Re: printing readably an array of type bit!
- Next by Date: Growing a data type?
- Previous by thread: Re: Global lexical variables?
- Next by thread: Re: Global lexical variables?
- Index(es):