Re: Symbol clashes: how to avoid them. Part 2
- From: Sacha <none@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:31:41 +0100
budden wrote:
- every independent expert would say very definitely that a.b.c is
much easier to read that (c-of (b-of a)). Don't even say about (slot-
value (slot-value a 'b) 'c). I showed my lisp sources printed to my
If you like the dot syntax, why don't you write a reader macro for it ?
Or maybe as an easier first step, a macro like this : (dots a b c).
Sacha
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Symbol clashes: how to avoid them. Part 2
- From: budden
- Re: Symbol clashes: how to avoid them. Part 2
- References:
- Re: Symbol clashes: how to avoid them. Part 2
- From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
- Re: Symbol clashes: how to avoid them. Part 2
- From: budden
- Re: Symbol clashes: how to avoid them. Part 2
- Prev by Date: Re: use-package & name conflict: why they are not deferred?
- Next by Date: Re: Symbol clashes: how to avoid them. Part 2
- Previous by thread: Re: Symbol clashes: how to avoid them. Part 2
- Next by thread: Re: Symbol clashes: how to avoid them. Part 2
- Index(es):