Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Cesar Rabak <csrabak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:41:42 -0300
Elena escreveu:
On 25 Mar, 02:20, Cesar Rabak <csra...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Elena escreveu:
On 25 Mar, 00:04, Cesar Rabak <csra...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I beg to differ!Elena escreveu:Sadly, no. I say "sadly" because it seems that few designers, notWhat about user defined ones? What about user-defined ones whichDo you know any other environment¹ where this happens?
share the name with a non consing library one? or should we
expect users to know all CL functions all the time?
[1] Taking out all "concept" or immature languages, and thinking of
production ones, of course.
just language designers, are really able to ease users' life.
Have a read:
http://www.amazon.com/Design-Everyday-Things-Donald-Norman/dp/0385267746
Afterward, maybe you won't differ anymore.
I still differ because IMO [programming] languages are artifacts we use for thinking, while keyboards (and stretching the concept the IDEs) are more mechanical devices.
Hope is clear now.And users are so used to warp themselves into ways of doing thingsI don't think the use of the word ergonomics applies to programming
(and "unergonomic" languages) just because that's how everyone has
always made.
languages except as a metalepsis (albeit a forced one).
That's the way I intended. Programming languages shouldn't be tied to
"ergonomics", if that would hamper their effectiveness. Look at Lisp's
parenthesis: you could argue they are "counter-intuitive", yet they
are there for a reason. (Albeit I argue that Lisp is "ergonomic":
after programming in it for a few days, looking at C++ or Java code
make my eyes ache; the opposite is not true).
For instance, early users of typewriters had to adjust themselves toWhich due my reasoning above makes this /non sequitur/. . .
the machines, because early typewriters had issues. Well, more than a
century later, we have modern keyboards but still have to adjust to
early typewriters because mainstream designers don't push for a real
improvement. Why bother? Do you know any other keyboard¹ where this
happens?
[1] Taking out all "concept" or immature keyboards, and thinking of
production ones, of course.
Why not?
Notwithstanding, notice that for a lot of workers the strains caused by
the non ergonomic keyboards are less and less an issue due the ways we
use them.
You've just stated that: they have been an useless issue for quite a
while.
Of course, if you are an hunt-and-peck typist, you couldn't mind less.
Or do you program with a speech recognition program?
I would say that in my work typing (be it programming or ordinary text) is 10% to 20% of the time, most time is used reading and in meetings.
For the PDA I have hand recognition applet, but speech recognition would be nice asap they become feasible for technical writing and programming ;-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Elena
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- References:
- Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Javier
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Elena
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Elena
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Javier
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Scott Burson
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Javier
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Kenneth Tilton
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Javier
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: gugamilare
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Javier
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Elena
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: eric-and-jane-smith
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Elena
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Cesar Rabak
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Elena
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Cesar Rabak
- Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- From: Elena
- Is a new CL standard possible?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- Next by Date: discount Obama series shoes,CA hoody,AF hoody,fashion Christan auaigier hoody,women CA hoody
- Previous by thread: Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- Next by thread: Re: Is a new CL standard possible?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|