Re: How useful is "trace"
- From: Francogrex <franco@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 14, 11:31 pm, t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Thomas A. Russ) wrote:
What would you like to see that would be clearer? What would the ideal
presentation look like?
Maybe it's too simplistic or optimistic but would have liked to see
something such as=
0+1=1
1+1=2
1+2=3
2+3=5
3+5=8
.... etc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How useful is "trace"
- From: TJ Atkins
- Re: How useful is "trace"
- From: Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: How useful is "trace"
- From: Raymond Toy
- Re: How useful is "trace"
- References:
- How useful is "trace"
- From: Francogrex
- Re: How useful is "trace"
- From: Thomas A. Russ
- How useful is "trace"
- Prev by Date: Rebuilding functions at run-time
- Next by Date: compiling (Qi to) Lisp to Python: some observations
- Previous by thread: Re: How useful is "trace"
- Next by thread: Re: How useful is "trace"
- Index(es):