Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- From: gugamilare <gugamilare@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
On 21 jul, 15:41, Tetrahedral Quartz <t.qua...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nicolas Neuss wrote:
No ordinary person has yet "significantly mastered" Common Lisp in two
weeks.
I guess I'm not ordinary then. (I do have more than two decades'
experience in IT, including with C, C++, Java, and other languages.)
Maybe a genius and expert could, but I'm sure that noone who
doesn't post to usenet under a real (and well-known) name can.
Apparently you'd be wrong about that.
Many people say that they know how to program in Lisp, but they don't.
Doing a couple of simple macros does not prove otherwise. I'm sorry,
but we can't just take your word on that.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- From: ACL
- Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- References:
- Really dumb LISP question.
- From: Bryan
- Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- From: ccc31807
- Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- From: Tetrahedral Quartz
- Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- From: vippstar
- Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- From: Tetrahedral Quartz
- Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- From: Nicolas Neuss
- Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- From: Tetrahedral Quartz
- Really dumb LISP question.
- Prev by Date: Re: If Scheme is so good why MIT drops it?
- Next by Date: Re: If Scheme is so good why MIT drops it?
- Previous by thread: Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- Next by thread: Re: Really dumb LISP question.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|