Re: Q: JVM based Lisp implementations and saving images - possible?

From: "Alex Mizrahi" <udodenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:54:36 +0300

??>> Performance is a relative thing. Loading SBCL for the first time
??>> (with cold cache) takes about 10 seconds on my system, I would not
??>> call that fast.

TFB> That sounds abnormal. Even on my 900 MHz PPC iBook, sbcl (0.9.5) only
TFB> takes 3 seconds to start when nothing's cached.

Yep, I was wrong.

.

References:
- Q: JVM based Lisp implementations and saving images - possible?
  - From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Q: JVM based Lisp implementations and saving images - possible?
  - From: Alessio Stalla
- Re: Q: JVM based Lisp implementations and saving images - possible?
  - From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Q: JVM based Lisp implementations and saving images - possible?
  - From: Alex Mizrahi
- Re: Q: JVM based Lisp implementations and saving images - possible?
  - From: Thomas F. Burdick

Prev by Date: Re: Q: JVM based Lisp implementations and saving images - possible?
Next by Date: Re: ECL 9.8.3 (bugfix release)
Previous by thread: Re: Q: JVM based Lisp implementations and saving images - possible?
Next by thread: Re: Q: JVM based Lisp implementations and saving images - possible?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread