Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- From: "Antti \"Andy\" Ylikoski" <antti.ylikoski@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:37:21 +0200
Antti "Andy" Ylikoski wrote:
D Herring wrote:On 02/12/2010 01:10 PM, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:Byung-Hee HWANG<bh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Byung-Hee HWANG<bh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
For first user, give me information about commnon lisp tools. At google,
most page go to CMUCL. But i also interested in GCL (GNU Common
Lisp). What is best choice?
Ah.. and please review about SBCL which from CMUCL ;;
Sorry for confused. After all, i settled down at CLISP (from GNU) ;;
Still i'm baby for Common Lisp, many many help me from now on ^^;
Please read this review of the different options.
http://common-lisp.net/~dlw/LispSurvey.html
Clisp is good. If you are interested in CMUCL for speed, SBCL is another good option (it forked from CMUCL many years ago). GCL is not widely used today.
My suggestion: stay with clisp until it causes a problem. By then, you should have learned enough to pick another implementation more suitable to your needs. The ansi standard and many portability libraries make it easy to switch.
- Daniel
See
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/lispbox/
the information there is a little bit outdated:
Clozure Common LISP has SLIME and works under Windows
Embeddable Common LISP is missing
many others are missing
Antti Ylikoski
Helsinki, Finland, the EU
IMHO the CLISP contains bugs.... Never came across one in the Clozure CCL.
Andy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- From: Zach Beane
- Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- References:
- CMUCL vs GCL
- From: Byung-Hee HWANG
- Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- From: Byung-Hee HWANG
- Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- From: Byung-Hee HWANG
- Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- From: D Herring
- Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- From: Antti \"Andy\" Ylikoski
- CMUCL vs GCL
- Prev by Date: Mesothelioma : Dangerous Malignant Cancer That Everyone Should Know It
- Next by Date: Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- Previous by thread: Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- Next by thread: Re: CMUCL vs GCL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|