Re: Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- From: pjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 19:06:32 +0200
Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 2010-05-27 13:16:24 -0400, Raymond Toy said:
But clisp has its own compiler, so if the presence of a compiler
disqualifies an app, won't clisp be disqualified?
Yes, clisp is disqualified for the simple reason that the current
Apple developer agreement stipulates that:
"Applications must be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or
JavaScript as executed by the iPhone OS WebKit engine."
But this doesn't mean anything! "Interpreter Pattern" "Brain Waves" !!!
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- References:
- Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- From: Marc Mientki
- Re: Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- From: Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- From: Raymond Toy
- Re: Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- From: Raffael Cavallaro
- Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- Prev by Date: Re: Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- Next by Date: Re: Free will
- Previous by thread: Re: Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- Next by thread: Re: Common Lisp for Mac OS X
- Index(es):