I stand corrected: CDR is a process

In article <rNOSPAMon-67DA7C.09430730042011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
RG <rNOSPAMon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <92244kFdv1U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Pascal Costanza <pc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 30/04/2011 08:21, RG wrote:
In article<9211q7Fcr4U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Pascal Costanza<pc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 29/04/2011 19:25, RG wrote:

But just to be clear, I am not raising this issue for its own sake, but
rather to highlight a much more serious problem: the CL community has no
process for addressing issues like this. *That* is (IMHO of course) the
most serious problem CL has.

There is a process for addressing issues like this. It's here:
http://cdr.eurolisp.org

With all due respect, and genuine admiration for what you are trying to
accomplish with CDR, a document repository is not a process.

Turns out I was wrong about this. Notwithstanding that the acronym
stands for Commonlisp Document Repository, CDR is in fact a process.
It's described here:

http://cdr.eurolisp.org/manual.html

I encourage anyone who has not looked at this to do so.

rg
.

Relevant Pages