Re: ternary cons?
- From: Xah Lee <xahlee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 16, 4:19 pm, Ankur <an...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Ankur <an...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your arguments against cons basically boil down to
"I don't understand it", which is not very convincing.
* Xah Lee <xah...@xxxxxxxxx>
like, when a man doesn't know anything about computers, and he tells
you YOUR software sucks, and it really is true.
Only if men who know nothing about computers are the target audience.
like, when a programer doesn't know anything about compilers, and he
tells you YOUR language sucks, and it really is true.
Xah
.
- References:
- ternary cons?
- From: D Herring
- Re: ternary cons?
- From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
- Re: ternary cons?
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: ternary cons?
- From: RG
- Re: ternary cons?
- From: Xah Lee
- Re: ternary cons?
- From: Ankur
- Re: ternary cons?
- From: Xah Lee
- Re: ternary cons?
- From: Ankur
- ternary cons?
- Prev by Date: Re: ternary cons?
- Next by Date: Re: ternary cons?
- Previous by thread: Re: ternary cons?
- Next by thread: Re: ternary cons?
- Index(es):