Garbage collection issue with DOUBLE-FLOAT vs. SINGLE-FLOAT
- From: Daniel Borchmann <daniel.borchmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:28:36 +0100
Dear cll,
welcome to my very first post on this list, in which I'd like to ask for
your assistance.
I've recently participated in a seminar assignment whose main task was
to implement Gauß' algorithm for solving systems of linear equations
(i.e. LU decomposition). I did that here
http://daniel.kxpq.de/pub/seminar.lisp
(sorry, the MIME type is not set correctly) and wanted to try it out on
some data sets, i.e.
http://daniel.kxpq.de/pub/testdata
http://daniel.kxpq.de/pub/testdata-double
The first one contains only SINGLE-FLOAT numbers and works quite well.
The second one, however, containes only DOUBLE-FLOAT numbers and makes
the garbage collector work like there is no tomorrow. See also those
profiling results
http://daniel.kxpq.de/pub/profile-double-cpu
http://daniel.kxpq.de/pub/profile-double-alloc
(again sorry for the not-set MIME types...)
Can anyone explain this to me? Why cause DOUBLE-FLOATs so much memory
consumption? I'm afraid this is caused by some intermediate results,
maybe due to COERCE, but I cannot see where this happens...
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Borchmann http://daniel.kxpq.de
GPG (Mail) 04A9 66A1 A17C C91E 39B5 8722 69B0 E96D A109 8F58
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Garbage collection issue with DOUBLE-FLOAT vs. SINGLE-FLOAT
- From: Kaz Kylheku
- Re: Garbage collection issue with DOUBLE-FLOAT vs. SINGLE-FLOAT
- From: Nicolas Neuss
- Re: Garbage collection issue with DOUBLE-FLOAT vs. SINGLE-FLOAT
- From: Frode V. Fjeld
- Re: Garbage collection issue with DOUBLE-FLOAT vs. SINGLE-FLOAT
- Prev by Date: Re: Rainer Joswig and Hackers
- Next by Date: Re: Garbage collection issue with DOUBLE-FLOAT vs. SINGLE-FLOAT
- Previous by thread: Disassemble an individual method
- Next by thread: Re: Garbage collection issue with DOUBLE-FLOAT vs. SINGLE-FLOAT
- Index(es):