Re: Impossible to Lambda calculus, LISP can be.
- From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 07 Jun 2012 12:44:07 +0300
Pascal J. Bourguignon writes:
mugabedaitouryou@xxxxxxxxx writes:
What good is this understanding?
Not too good, but we can guess what you mean.
Actually, I think you read mugabedaitouryou's question exactly
backwards :) I think they asked if Lisp's generalized conditional
expression, where any non-nil value counts as true, can be expressed
directly in lambda calculus.
I think mugabedaitouryou's understanding is good: in some sense, the
generalized conditional expression needs to be a primitive.
.
- References:
- Impossible to Lambda calculus, LISP can be.
- From: mugabedaitouryou
- Impossible to Lambda calculus, LISP can be.
- Prev by Date: Re: I'm stuck with code in a quoted list
- Next by Date: Re: Impossible to Lambda calculus, LISP can be.
- Previous by thread: Impossible to Lambda calculus, LISP can be.
- Next by thread: Re: Impossible to Lambda calculus, LISP can be.
- Index(es):