$HTTP_POST_FILES vs $_FILES
From: Yang Li Ke (yanglike_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 12/31/03
- Next message: CountScubula: "Re: preg_replace and an include file"
- Previous message: Tony Harrison: "Re: dynamic web page creation"
- Next in thread: Janwillem Borleffs: "Re: $HTTP_POST_FILES vs $_FILES"
- Reply: Janwillem Borleffs: "Re: $HTTP_POST_FILES vs $_FILES"
- Reply: Savut: "Re: $HTTP_POST_FILES vs $_FILES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:36:26 -0500
Hey guys!
I have heard that it might be better using
$HTTP_POST_FILES for php version 4.1 and lower
and using $_FILES for 4.1 and higher...
Anyone knows what is the difference really?
why not simply using $HTTP_POST_FILES on all ?
Thanx for your help
-- Yang
- Next message: CountScubula: "Re: preg_replace and an include file"
- Previous message: Tony Harrison: "Re: dynamic web page creation"
- Next in thread: Janwillem Borleffs: "Re: $HTTP_POST_FILES vs $_FILES"
- Reply: Janwillem Borleffs: "Re: $HTTP_POST_FILES vs $_FILES"
- Reply: Savut: "Re: $HTTP_POST_FILES vs $_FILES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
