Re: calling included remote functions
From: Geoff Berrow (bl_at_ckdog.co.uk)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Dave: "Re: php and sed"
- Previous message: Julia Briggs: "Re: Beginner question: detecting specified character in string"
- In reply to: juglesh: "Re: calling included remote functions"
- Next in thread: juglesh: "Re: calling included remote functions"
- Reply: juglesh: "Re: calling included remote functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:51:08 +0000
I noticed that Message-ID: <iaadnT-hcesrEYPfRVn-pw@comcast.com> from
juglesh contained the following:
>I have a script that I would like to deploy over several websites. And
>if/when I want to tweak the code, I don't want to have to go updating all
>the sites. The scripts in question must be run on the 'satellite' sites
>(unless of course I want everybody's picture galleries displaying *my* trip
>to Disneyland!)
Remember
input->process->output.
In other words you send information to the processing script (e.g.
location of photo directory, number of photos to display or it could
handle database queries). This script then takes that information and
processes it creating and outputting the html necessary to create the
viewing page. If the photo links were absolute there is no reason why
pone script could not serve any number of sites. Security may be an
issue to avoid the script being used by unauthorised users.
-- Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email) It's only Usenet, no one dies. My opinions, not the committee's, mine. Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
- Next message: Dave: "Re: php and sed"
- Previous message: Julia Briggs: "Re: Beginner question: detecting specified character in string"
- In reply to: juglesh: "Re: calling included remote functions"
- Next in thread: juglesh: "Re: calling included remote functions"
- Reply: juglesh: "Re: calling included remote functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|